Salt Lake City loses its lawsuit over the Inland Port
SALT LAKE CITY – A judge has tossed Salt Lake City’s lawsuit against the Inland Port project on Wednesday, ruling that the state did not violate the Utah Constitution.
The ruling is seen as a major blow to opponents of the 16,000 acre trade hub planned for the westside of the city.
Former Salt Lake City mayor Jackie Biscupski had argued the state overstepped its bounds when it created an 11-member board to control the project, bypassing the authority of the city on issues like land use and taxation.
3rd District Court Judge James Blanch rejected the city’s lawsuit, ruling the Inland Port Authority Act does not violate the “Ripper Clause” of the state constitution. The clause covers local powers like land use zoning, municipal taxes, and municipal functions.
Inland Port Authority Chairman Jack Hedge released a statement saying they were “pleased” with the ruling and, “look forward to continuing the work with our great municipal and county partners to the benefit of all the citizens of Utah.” Governor Gary Herbert expressed similar sentiments.
However, new mayor Erin Mendenhall said she was disappointed with the decision and that the city will appeal to the Utah Supreme Court.
Today’s Top Stories
- FBI seeking information on whereabouts of serial bank robber
- 13 year old hospitalized after being run over in Bountiful
- Salt Lake City Police investigating shooting at Meadows Park
- Deputies say evidence pointing to likely homicide in case of Dylan Rounds
- Salt Lake County DA discusses Biden’s pardon of marijuana possession
- ‘I guess we were meant to be there,’ says woman who saved driver from car fire
- Search for wanted fugitive in Tooele is unsuccessful
- How facial plastic surgery and skincare are joining forces
- Biden to pardon all federal offenses of simple marijuana possession in first major steps…
- Utah debates: Here’s how 3rd District candidates stand on the issues (Rep. John Curtis…