WASHINGTON (AP) — In a ruling that could help push changes in college athletics, the Supreme Court on Monday unanimously sided with a group of former college athletes in a dispute with the NCAA over rules limiting certain compensation.
The high court ruled that NCAA limits on the education-related benefits that colleges can offer athletes who play Division I basketball and football can’t be enforced.
Under current NCAA rules, students cannot be paid, and the scholarship money colleges can offer is capped at the cost of attending the school. The NCAA had defended its rules as necessary to preserve the amateur nature of college sports.
But the former athletes who brought the case, including former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston, argued that the NCAA’s rules on education-related compensation were unfair and violate federal antitrust law designed to promote competition.
The case doesn’t decide whether students can be paid salaries. Instead, the ruling will help determine whether schools decide to offer athletes tens of thousands of dollars in education-related benefits for things such as computers, graduate scholarships, tutoring, study abroad and internships.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
Today’s Top Stories
- Instagram user says she saw Petito and Laundrie in Wyoming restaurant
- Family of former BYU and NFL player wins lawsuit against blinds manufacturer
- Don’t second-guess Moab police in Gabby Petito case, says lawyer
- 911 call that prompted interaction with Gabby Petito released
- Woman dead, man hurt after police chase and crash in Summit County
- Beloved ‘Sex and the City’ actor Willie Garson dies at 57
- Body recovered, half-brother sought around Yellowstone lake
- First Presidency urge masks be worn at all times in temples
- Underwater dive team arrives to scene of search for Gabby Petito’s fiancé Brian Laundrie
- Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints won’t provide vaccine exemptions